Parliamentary Discourse


Teun A. van Dijk

Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona

teun at discourses dot org

March 2006



Andrews, J. R. (1993). The Rhetorical Shaping of National Interest: Morality and Contextual Potency in Bright,John Parliamentary Speech Against Recognition of the Confederacy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79(1), 40-60.


Atkyns, R. (1698). The power, jurisdiction and priviledge of Parliament and the antiquity of the House of Commons asserted : Occasion'd by an information in the Kings Bench, by the Attorney General, against the Speaker of the House of Commons : as also A discourse concer. London: Printed for Timonthy Goodwin ..


Bayley, P. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.


Biryukov, N., Gleisner, J., & Sergeyev, V. (1995). The Crisis of ´sobornost´: Parliamentary Discourse in Present-Day Russia. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 149-175.


Biryuokov, N., & Sergeyev, V. (1993). Parliamentarianism and sobornost´. Discourse & Society, 4(1), 57-74.


Bystrom, D. G., & Miller, J. L. (1999). Gendered communication styles and strategies in campaign 1996: The videostyles of women and men candidates. In: Bystrom, Dianne G., & Kaid, Lynda Lee. (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication. (pp.293-302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.


Carbó, T. (1983). Le débat indigéniste au Mexique: Un exemple d'analyse du discours parlementaire. (The debates on indigenous population in Mexico: a sample of parliamentary discourse analysis). Langage et Société, 26, 3-26.


Carbó, T. (1987). Identité et différence dans le discours parlementaire mexicaine. (Identity and difference in Mexican parliamentary discourse). Langage et Société, 39, 31-44.


Carbó, T. (1992). Towards an interpretation of interruptions in Mexican parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 25-45.


Carbó, T. (1995). El discurso parlamentario mexicano entre 1920 y 1950. Un estudio de caso en metodología de análisis de discurso. (Mexican parliamentary discourse between 1920 and 1950. A case study in the methodology of discourse analysis). 2 vols. Mexico: CIESAS and Colegio de México.


Cederberg, A. (1993). Stil och strategi i riksdagsretoriken. En undersökning av debattspråkets utveckling i den svenska tvåkammarriksdagen (1867-1970). (Style and strategy in parliamentary rhetoric. An investigation of the development of the language of debate in Swedish bicameral parliament). University of Uppsala: Institute of Nordic Languages.


Cole, W., & Boucher, L. (1989). Le langage parlementaire The language of Parliament / Wayne Cole, Lise Boucher ; in cooperation with Alain Bélanger et Ronald Després. --. Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing Centre.


Dolowitz, D., Marsh, D., Oneill, F., & Richards, D. (1996). Thatcherism and the 3-RS: Radicalism, Realism and Rhetoric in the 3rd Term of the Thatcher Government. Parliamentary Affairs, 49(3), 455-470.


Drescher, S. (1990). People and Parliament: The Rhetoric of the British Slave-Trade. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 20(4), 561-580.


Gold-Biss, M. (1994). The discourse on terrorism. Political violence and the Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism, 1981-1986. New York: Lang.


Hennessy, P. (2005). Rulers and servants of the state: The Blair style of government 1997-2004. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(1), 6-+.


Hoffmeister, F. (2003). European Convention on Human-Rights: Language Requirements for Candidates in National Parliamentary Elections: Procedural Safeguards: Political-Participation of Russian-Speaking Minority in Latvia. American Journal of International Law, 97(3), 664-669.


Holly, W. (1982).  Zur Geschichte parlamentarischen Sprachhandelns in Deutschland. Eine historisch-pragmatische Skizze an Beispielen aus ersten Sitzungen von verfassungsgebenden Versammlungen. (On the History of Parliamentary Speech Acts in Germany: A Historical-Pragmatic Outline with Examples from the First Sessions of Constituent Assemblies). LiLi, Zeitschrift fur Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 12, 47, 10-48.


Ilie, C. (2001). Unparliamentary language: insults as cognitive forms of confrontation. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, & C. Ilie (Eds.), Language and Ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches (pp. 235-263). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.


Ilie, C. (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 1(2), 269-291.


Ilie, C. (2003). Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary parentheticals as rhetorical strategies. In M. Bondi & S. Stati (Eds.), Current Studies in Dialogic Communication (pp. 253-264). Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.


Ilie, C. (2004). Insulting as (un) parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments. A rhetorical approach. In P. Bayley (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.


Jacobs, D. (1998). Discourse, Politics and Policy: The Dutch Parliamentary Debate About Voting-Rights for Foreign Residents. International Migration Review, 32(2), 350-373.


Johnson, S. (1794). Magna charta, with its history and defence from the invasion of Julius Caesar to the present time : With the full rights, Scots claim of rights, Habeas corpus act, and an introductory discourse, with an essay on parliaments. Edinburgh: Printed for J. Denoon and D. Clark.


Johnston, A., & White, A. B. (1994). Communication Styles and Female Candidates: A Study of the Political Advertising During the 1986 Senate Elections. Journalism Quarterly, 71(2), 321-329.


Jones, L. (2000). Immigration and parliamentary discourse in Great Britain. An analysis of the debates related to the 1996 Asylum and Immigration Act. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. (pp. 283-310). Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.


Kopperschmidt, J. (1989). Offentliche Rede in Deutschland. Überlegungen zur politischen Rhetorik mit Blick auf zwei Gedenkreden im Deutschen Bundestag. (Public Speech in Germany. Reflections on Political Rhetoric and Two Commemorative Addresses in the German Parliament). Muttersprache, 99(3), 213-230.


Kopperschmidt, J. (1989). Überlegungen zur politischen Rhetorik mit Blick auf zwei Gedenkreden im Deutschen Bundestag. (Public Speech in Germany. Reflections on Political Rhetoric and Two Commemorative Addresses in the German Parliament). Öffentliche Rede in Deutschland. Muttersprache, 99(3), 213-230.


Leach, S., & Pratchett, L. (2005). Local government: A new vision, rhetoric or reality? Parliamentary Affairs, 58(2), 318-334.


Levinger, M. (1990). The Protest Rhetoric of the Parlement of Rouen, 1753-1763. Annales-Economies Societes Civilisations, 45(3), 589-613.


Martín Rojo, L., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). ”There was a problem, and it was solved!” Legitimating the Expulsion of ´Illegal´ Immigrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 523-567.


Moosmüller, S. (1989). Phonological variation in parliamentary discussions. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Language, power and ideology. (pp. 165-180). Amsterdam: Benjamins.


Musolf, K. J. (1999). From Plymouth to Parliament a rhetorical history of Nancy Astor's 1919 campaign. New York: St. Martin's Press.


Oneill, M. (2000). Belgium: Language, Ethnicity and Nationality. Parliamentary Affairs, 53(1), 114-134.


Parry, S. (2003). The Politics of Cloning: Mapping the Rhetorical Convergence of Embryos and Stem-Cells in Parliamentary Debates. New Genetics and Society, 22(2), 145-168.


Pell, C. (1995). Civil Discourse is Crucial for Democracy to Work. Insight, 11(37), 13.


Penny, L., Fitzhardinge, S., & Materne, H. (1995). The Language of the Suffrage Debates in the South Australian Parliament, 1885-94. Forensic Linguistics, 2(1), 56-64.


Petyt, W. (1680). The antient right of the Commons of England asserted or, A discourse proving by records and the best historians that the Commons of England were ever an essential part of Parliament. London: Smith.


Piotrowski, A. (1994). The rhetorics of collective identity in the Polish political discourse. A case study of two parliamentary speeches. Bielefeld: ZiF.


Reid, C. (2004). Character construction in the eighteenth-century house of commons: Evidence from the Cavendish diary (1768-74). Rhetorica-a Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 22(4), 375-399.


Rojo, L. M., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 523-566.


Sawer, M. (2000). Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 361-380.


Sinclair, B. (1986). Senate Styles and Senate Decision-Making, 1955-1980. Journal of Politics, 48(4), 877-908.


Smith, J. L. (2003). 'Suitable mothers': lesbian and single women and the 'unborn' in Australian parliamentary discourse. Critical Social Policy, 23(1), 63-88.

Steiner, J. (2004). Deliberative politics in action. Analysing parliamentary discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.


Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 365-375.


Thomas, D. (2000). Slovakia: Language and National Unity. Parliamentary Affairs, 53(1), 135-141.


Van der Valk, I. (2002). Difference, deviance, threat? Mainstream and Right-Extremist Political Discourse on Ethnic Issues in the Netherlands and France (1990-1997). Amsterdam: Aksant.


Van der Valk, I. (2003). Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse & Society, 14(3), 309-348.


Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Political discourse and racism: Describing Others in Western parliaments. In: Riggins, Stephen Harold. (Ed.), The language and politics of exclusion:Others in discourse. Communication and human values, Vol. 24. (pp. 31-64). .


Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration. In M. Reisigl & R. Wodak (Eds.), The semiotics of racism. Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 85-104).


Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Parliamentary Debates. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. (pp. 45-78). Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.


Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), 93-129.


Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Text and context of parliamentary debates. In Paul Bayley (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. (pp. 339-372). Amsterdam: Benjamins.


Wodak, R. (2003). Multiple identities: The roles of female parliamentarians in the EU parliament. In Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender. (pp. 671-698). Oxford: Blackwell.


Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2000). Discourse and racism. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European Countries. (pp. 31-44). Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.


Wodak, R., & Van Dijk, T. A. (Eds.). (2000). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.