Parliamentary
Discourse
Teun A. van Dijk
Universitat
Pompeu Fabra,
teun at
discourses dot
org
March
2006
Andrews,
J. R. (1993). The Rhetorical Shaping of National Interest: Morality and
Contextual Potency in Bright,John Parliamentary Speech Against
Recognition of
the Confederacy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79(1), 40-60.
Atkyns,
R. (1698). The power, jurisdiction and priviledge of Parliament and the
antiquity of the House of Commons asserted : Occasion'd by an
information in
the Kings Bench, by the Attorney General, against the Speaker of the
House of
Commons : as also A discourse concer.
Bayley,
P. (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse.
Biryukov,
N., Gleisner, J., & Sergeyev, V. (1995). The Crisis of ´sobornost´:
Parliamentary Discourse in Present-Day Russia. Discourse & Society,
6(2),
149-175.
Biryuokov,
N., & Sergeyev, V. (1993). Parliamentarianism and sobornost´.
Discourse
& Society, 4(1), 57-74.
Bystrom,
D. G., & Miller, J. L. (1999). Gendered communication styles and
strategies
in campaign 1996: The videostyles of women and men candidates. In:
Bystrom,
Dianne G., & Kaid, Lynda Lee. (Eds.), The electronic election:
Perspectives
on the 1996 campaign communication. (pp.293-302).
Carbó,
T. (1983). Le débat indigéniste au Mexique: Un exemple d'analyse du
discours
parlementaire. (The debates on indigenous population in
Carbó,
T. (1987). Identité et différence dans le discours parlementaire
mexicaine.
(Identity and difference in Mexican parliamentary discourse). Langage
et
Société, 39, 31-44.
Carbó,
T. (1992). Towards an interpretation of interruptions in Mexican
parliamentary
discourse. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 25-45.
Carbó,
T. (1995). El discurso parlamentario mexicano entre 1920 y 1950. Un
estudio de
caso en metodología de análisis de discurso. (Mexican parliamentary
discourse
between 1920 and
Cederberg,
A. (1993). Stil och strategi i riksdagsretoriken. En undersökning av
debattspråkets utveckling i den svenska tvåkammarriksdagen (1867-1970).
(Style
and strategy in parliamentary rhetoric. An investigation of the
development of
the language of debate in Swedish bicameral parliament).
Cole,
W., & Boucher, L. (1989). Le langage parlementaire The language of
Parliament / Wayne Cole, Lise Boucher ; in cooperation with Alain
Bélanger et
Ronald Després. --.
Dolowitz,
D., Marsh, D., Oneill, F., & Richards, D. (1996). Thatcherism and
the 3-RS:
Radicalism, Realism and Rhetoric in the 3rd Term of the Thatcher
Government.
Parliamentary Affairs, 49(3), 455-470.
Drescher,
S. (1990). People and Parliament: The Rhetoric of the British
Slave-Trade.
Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 20(4), 561-580.
Gold-Biss,
M. (1994). The discourse on terrorism. Political violence and the
Subcommittee
on Security and Terrorism, 1981-1986.
Hennessy,
P. (2005). Rulers and servants of the state: The Blair style of
government
1997-2004. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(1), 6-+.
Hoffmeister,
F. (2003). European Convention on Human-Rights: Language Requirements
for
Candidates in National Parliamentary Elections: Procedural Safeguards:
Political-Participation of Russian-Speaking Minority in
Holly,
W. (1982). Zur Geschichte
parlamentarischen Sprachhandelns in Deutschland. Eine
historisch-pragmatische
Skizze an Beispielen aus ersten Sitzungen von verfassungsgebenden
Versammlungen. (On the History of Parliamentary Speech Acts in
Ilie,
C. (2001). Unparliamentary language: insults as cognitive forms of
confrontation. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, & C. Ilie (Eds.), Language
and
Ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches (pp. 235-263).
Ilie,
C. (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates.
Journal of
Language and Politics, 1(2), 269-291.
Ilie,
C. (2003). Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary parentheticals as
rhetorical
strategies. In M. Bondi & S. Stati (Eds.), Current Studies in
Dialogic
Communication (pp. 253-264).
Ilie,
C. (2004). Insulting as (un) parliamentary practice in the British and
Swedish
parliaments. A rhetorical approach. In P. Bayley (Ed.), Cross-cultural
perspectives on parliamentary discourse.
Jacobs,
D. (1998). Discourse, Politics and Policy: The Dutch Parliamentary
Debate About
Voting-Rights for Foreign Residents. International Migration Review,
32(2),
350-373.
Johnson,
S. (1794). Magna charta, with its history and defence from the invasion
of
Julius Caesar to the present time : With the full rights, Scots claim
of
rights, Habeas corpus act, and an introductory discourse, with an essay
on
parliaments.
Johnston,
A., & White, A. B. (1994). Communication Styles and Female
Candidates: A
Study of the Political Advertising During the 1986 Senate Elections.
Journalism
Quarterly, 71(2), 321-329.
Jones,
L. (2000). Immigration and parliamentary discourse in
Kopperschmidt,
J. (1989). Offentliche Rede in Deutschland. Überlegungen zur
politischen
Rhetorik mit Blick auf zwei Gedenkreden im Deutschen Bundestag. (Public
Speech
in
Kopperschmidt,
J. (1989). Überlegungen zur politischen Rhetorik mit Blick auf zwei
Gedenkreden
im Deutschen Bundestag. (Public Speech in
Leach,
S., & Pratchett, L. (2005). Local government: A new vision,
rhetoric or
reality? Parliamentary Affairs, 58(2), 318-334.
Levinger,
M. (1990). The Protest Rhetoric of the Parlement of
Martín
Rojo, L., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). ”There was a problem, and it
was
solved!” Legitimating the Expulsion of ´Illegal´ Immigrants in Spanish
Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 523-567.
Moosmüller,
S. (1989). Phonological variation in parliamentary discussions. In R.
Wodak
(Ed.), Language, power and ideology. (pp. 165-180).
Musolf,
K. J. (1999). From
Oneill,
M. (2000).
Parry,
S. (2003). The Politics of Cloning: Mapping the Rhetorical Convergence
of
Embryos and Stem-Cells in Parliamentary Debates. New Genetics and
Society,
22(2), 145-168.
Pell,
C. (1995). Civil Discourse is Crucial for Democracy to Work. Insight,
11(37),
13.
Penny,
L., Fitzhardinge, S., & Materne, H. (1995). The Language of the
Suffrage
Debates in the South Australian Parliament, 1885-94. Forensic
Linguistics,
2(1), 56-64.
Petyt,
W. (1680). The antient right of the Commons of England asserted or, A
discourse
proving by records and the best historians that the Commons of England
were
ever an essential part of Parliament.
Piotrowski,
A. (1994). The rhetorics of collective identity in the Polish political
discourse. A case study of two parliamentary speeches.
Reid,
C. (2004). Character construction in the eighteenth-century house of
commons:
Evidence from the Cavendish diary (1768-74). Rhetorica-a Journal of the
History
of Rhetoric, 22(4), 375-399.
Rojo,
L. M., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). There Was a Problem, and It Was
Solved:
Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary
Discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 523-566.
Sawer,
M. (2000). Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of
Justice to
Strategies of Accountability. International Political Science Review,
21(4),
361-380.
Sinclair,
B. (1986). Senate Styles and Senate Decision-Making, 1955-1980. Journal
of
Politics, 48(4), 877-908.
Smith,
J. L. (2003). 'Suitable mothers': lesbian and single women and the
'unborn' in
Australian parliamentary discourse. Critical Social Policy, 23(1),
63-88.
Steiner,
J. (2004). Deliberative politics in action. Analysing parliamentary
discourse.
Tetlock,
P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the
British House
of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 365-375.
Thomas,
D. (2000).
Van der Valk,
Van
der Valk,
Van
Dijk, T. A. (1997). Political discourse and racism: Describing Others
in
Western parliaments. In: Riggins, Stephen Harold. (Ed.), The language
and
politics of exclusion:Others in discourse. Communication and human
values, Vol.
24. (pp. 31-64). .
Van
Dijk, T. A. (2000). On the analysis of parliamentary debates on
immigration. In
M. Reisigl & R. Wodak (Eds.), The semiotics of racism. Approaches
to
Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 85-104).
Van
Dijk, T. A. (2000). Parliamentary Debates. In R. Wodak & T. A. van
Dijk
(Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in
Six
European States. (pp. 45-78).
Van
Dijk, T. A. (2003). Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of
Language and
Politics, 2(1), 93-129.
Van
Dijk, T. A. (2004). Text and context of parliamentary debates. In Paul
Bayley
(Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. (pp.
339-372).
Wodak,
R. (2003). Multiple identities: The roles of female parliamentarians in
the EU
parliament. In Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.), The handbook of
language
and gender. (pp. 671-698).
Wodak,
R., & Reisigl, M. (2000). Discourse and racism. In R. Wodak &
T. A. van
Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic
Issues in
Six European Countries. (pp. 31-44).
Wodak,
R., & Van Dijk, T. A. (Eds.). (2000). Racism at the Top.
Parliamentary
Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States.